Principles › Hearing each other

Hearing each other

Understand before answering

Show you’ve heard them before making your own point.

For example

Porcupine · a tipSam, before you answer, you might say back what you heard Jordan ask for.

How Porcupine uses it

In practice

Reflect back first

Say what you heard before adding your view.

Validate the feeling

Acknowledge that their feeling makes sense, even if you see the facts differently.

Ask real questions

Curious follow-up questions show you’re listening and invite them to share.

Why it helps

Feeling understood tends to lower people’s guard. In experiments, people who were listened to well felt less anxious and defensive and held their views less rigidly, and people who heard their words reflected back felt more understood than people who got advice. Reflecting back what you heard, acknowledging that a feeling makes sense, and asking a real question are small ways to show you’ve understood. Feeling understood doesn’t require agreement, and it doesn’t guarantee the disagreement will settle, but it can make the rest of the conversation easier.

What we don’t know yet

Most of the listening studies involved strangers or coworkers in short conversations, and the studies of couples were mostly of satisfied couples. Feeling understood also isn’t the same as being persuaded: in one large experiment, listening made a conversation go better without making it any more convincing.

See it in a conversation

The research

Studied with couples

In seven studies of couples, including experiments, a diary study and couples discussing a disagreement in the lab, conflict did much less harm to relationship satisfaction when people felt their partner understood them. The benefit wasn’t just a matter of the disagreement getting resolved.

Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2016). Do you get where I’m coming from?: Perceived understanding buffers against the negative impact of conflict on relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 239–260.

Studied with adults in general

In four experiments on disagreements, including live conversations, people who were listened to attentively and without judgment felt more connected to the listener, reflected on their view less defensively, and held it less extremely. The listeners were trained, and the conversations were short.

Itzchakov, G., Weinstein, N., Leary, M., Saluk, D., & Amar, M. (2024). Listening to understand: The role of high-quality listening on speakers’ attitude depolarization during disagreements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(2), 213–239.

Studied with adults in general

In a field experiment with 1,485 people in the U.S., trained canvassers had short video conversations with them about immigration. When the canvassers listened well, people saw them more favorably and thought more about the conversation, but listening didn’t make the canvassers any more persuasive.

Santoro, E., Broockman, D. E., Kalla, J. L., & Porat, R. (2025). Listen for a change? A longitudinal field experiment on listening’s potential to enhance persuasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(8), e2421982122.

More research

Studied with adults in general

In experiments, people who were listened to well felt less anxious and defensive, and held their views less rigidly, than people who were listened to poorly.

Itzchakov, G., Kluger, A. N., & Castro, D. R. (2017). I am aware of my inconsistencies but can tolerate them: The effect of high quality listening on speakers’ attitude ambivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 105–120.

Studied with coworkers

A registered review of research on listening at work found that people who felt listened to reported better relationships with the listener and better performance. Most of the studies relied on people’s own reports, but the link held, more weakly, in the studies that didn’t.

Kluger, A. N., Lehmann, M., Aguinis, H., Itzchakov, G., Gordoni, G., Zyberaj, J., & Bakaç, C. (2024). A meta-analytic systematic review and theory of the effects of perceived listening on work outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(2), 295–344.

Studied with adults in general

In an experiment, people who got active-listening responses, including paraphrasing, felt more understood than people who got advice or simple acknowledgments.

Weger, H., Castle Bell, G., Minei, E. M., & Robinson, M. C. (2014). The relative effectiveness of active listening in initial interactions. International Journal of Listening, 28(1), 13–31.

Studied with couples

In a controlled study, couples who took PREP, a five-session program that teaches communication skills including a structured way to take turns speaking and reflecting back, communicated more positively and less negatively four to five years later than couples who didn’t. It tested the whole program, not reflecting back alone.

Markman, H. J., Renick, M. J., Floyd, F. J., Stanley, S. M., & Clements, M. (1993). Preventing marital distress through communication and conflict management training: A 4- and 5-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 70–77.

Studied with adults in general

In a lab experiment, people who got invalidating responses during a stressful task had more negative feelings, and a higher heart rate and skin conductance, than people who got validating responses.

Shenk, C. E., & Fruzzetti, A. E. (2011). The impact of validating and invalidating responses on emotional reactivity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(2), 163–183.

Studied with adults in general

In experiments, people asked to pose more questions, especially follow-up questions, were better liked by their conversation partners.

Huang, K., Yeomans, M., Brooks, A. W., Minson, J., & Gino, F. (2017). It doesn’t hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 430–452.

Library last updated October 2026.